Protecting victims and not protecting criminals
Slowly but surely, Ohio lawmakers are progressing in the effort to better protect victims, rather than offering protection to criminals. On Wednesday the state Senate voted unanimously to eliminate exceptions to certain sex offenses that apply if the victim is the spouse.
This outdated remnant had been allowed to do damage for too long. But last November, the state House of Representatives passed a similar bill with a nearly unanimous vote.
Goodness knows what state Rep. Bill Dean, R-Xenia, was thinking when he cast the lone “nay” vote.
But no matter. A bill that eliminates the exception for rape if the spouse lives with the offender is now on its way to Gov. Mike DeWine’s desk.
Offenses outlined in House Bill 161 include rape, sexual battery, unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, gross sexual imposition, sexual imposition and importuning. It also allows an individual to testify against their spouse if they choose to prosecute for any of the listed sex offenses.
“I’m grateful to finally see it come to fruition so we can close this loophole in Ohio’s law, providing protection to all survivors of sexual violence,” state Sen. Stephanie Kunze, R-Dublin, said, according to a report by WBNS.
It’s proof the vast majority of lawmakers ARE capable of understanding some issues are not “social” or “cultural,” but simply a matter of right and wrong. Perhaps Ohioans can be encouraged this is a baby step toward more positive change in the way the folks in Columbus think about the human beings they have been elected to serve.
