Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Mojo the Rooster | Home RSS
 
 
 

All he wrote

February 7, 2013
Morning Journal News

Editor:

I'm surprised at the number of people I talk to who don't understand the coverup at Bengazhi, so here goes.

First we establish that election day was near and that Obama was obsessed with another term. An important part of his re-election effort was to convince the American people that with the killing of Osama Bin Laden the Al-Quaeda terrorists had been vanquished. From this point on the words terrorists and terrorism would not be used in describing any future scuttles or riots that might occur.

However, despite warnings to the State Department that there would be potential trouble at our Arab embassies on the anniversary of 9/11, the warnings fell upon deaf ears. Then we had the attack on the embassy at Bengazhi by Al-Quaeda using heavy weapons and killing four of our people. There were dispatches sent several hours ahead of time to Washington asking for help.

By now David Pfloffe, Obama and David Axelrod are in the situation room consulting with Hillary Clinton and they decide if they give the OK for our military to provide backup at the embassy it would acknowledge that Al-Quaeda was still very much alive and that the word terrorism would be branded on the Al-Quaeda attack. They knew it was being planned by Al-Quaeda because they were apprised of the weapons that were about to be used as well as how organized the assembling forces were.

After assessing all this it was determined that a military response would jeopardize Obama's re-election so they threw our personnel to the dogs and did nothing. Next they had their cronies surf the Internet for any kind of video that might be defamatory to Muslims and after careful scrutiny finally selected one that was especially inflammatory. They then told the American people that the Bengazhi incident was the result of mob violence instigated by this video.

Obama asked Clinton to get out there and back up the lie. She refused. So he chose our ambassador to the U.N., Susan Rice, as the sacrificial lamb and she did the lying which cost her the job as secretary of state. Hillary says she takes responsibility but not the blame.

What is that suppose to mean? Lies, lies and lies. Well, anyhow that's the whole story in a nutshell, folks.

Lloyd Berresford

Hanoverton

 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web